Differences between audio lingual and clt

Read More about Teaching English Communicative activities only come after a long process of rigid drills and exercises. Native language Judicious use of native language is accepted where feasible.

Find your Free English Literature Essays. Monday, March 15, Differences Between Audio Lingual and Communicative language teaching Methods Differences Between Audio Lingual and Communicative language teaching Methods The audio lingual method, or the Army method, or also the New key, is the mode of language instruction based on behaviourist ideology, which professes that certain traits of living things could be trained through a system of reinforcement.

The instructor would present the correct model of a sentence and the students would have to repeat it. The teacher would then continue by presenting new words for the students to sample in the same structure. There is no explicit grammar instruction everything is simply memorized in form. The idea is for the students to practice the particular construction untill they can use it spontaneously.

In this manner, the lessons are built on static drills in which the students have little or no control on their own output. The communicative language teaching is am approach to the teaching of second and foreign languages that emphasizes communication or interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language.

Audiolingual Method and Communicative Language Teaching: A Comparison | Free Content Web

The clt was the product of educators and linguists who had grown dissatisfied with earlier Grammer Translation and Audio Lingual Methods, where students were nott learning enough realistic, socially necessary language.

Therefore they became interested in the development of communicative style teaching in the s, focussing on authentic language use and classroom exchanges where students engaged in real communication with one another. The goal of clt is of creating communicative competence in the learners.

It makes use of real life situations. Basic differences as presented by Finocchiaro and Brumfit are given below: Meaning and structure ALM: Attends to structure and form more than meaning.

Contextualization is a basic premise. Language items are not necessarily contextualized. Language learning is learning to communicate. Language Learning is learning structures, sounds or words. Effective communication is sought.

Mastery or "overlearning" is sought. Drilling may occur, but peripherially. Drilling is a central technique. Comprehensible pronunciation is sought. Native-speaker-like pronunciation is sought. Any device which helps the learners is accepted - varying according to their age, interest, etc.

Grammatical explanation is avoided. Attempts to communicate may be encouraged from the very beginning.

Differences Between Audio Lingual and Communicative Language Teaching Methods

Communicative activities only come after a long process of rigid drills and exercises.Mar 15,  · Differences Between Audio Lingual and Communicative language teaching Methods. The audio lingual method, or the Army method, or also the New key, is the mode of language instruction based on behaviourist ideology, which professes that certain traits of living things could be trained through a system of reinforcement.

Compare and contrast between the Audio-Lingual Method and Communicative Language Teaching - Free download as Word Doc .doc), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Compare and contrast between the Audio-Lingual Method and Communicative Language Teaching on the basis of different issues related.5/5(33).

(5) An attempt to link classroom language learning with language activation outside the classroom Basic differences between the Audio-Lingual Method and CLT as presented by Finocchiaro and Brumfit () are given below: Audio-lingual /5(33). Audiolingual Method and Communicative Language Teaching: A Comparison.

Since the early days of humanity, for many different reasons – economic, diplomatic, social, commercial, or military - there is the need of getting in contact with speakers of other languages.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE AUDIO-LINGUAL METHOD AND CLT: AUDIO-LINGUAL COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING 1. Meaning and structure Attends to structure and form more than meaning.

Meaning is paramount. 2. Memorization Demands memorization of . Give the contrast between CLT and ALM. The Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Audio-lingual Method (ALM) have both importance in learning second language or foreign language around the world to develop communication skills.